Monday, February 20, 2012

Week 5


Coming into this course, I did not understand the nomenclature involving action research.  In my ten years of education, I have mostly done what I am told and not been involved in investigating or solving problems.  When I decided to begin my master’s degree classes, I envisioned reading about what others had done as school leaders and analyzing their findings.  Action research allows the principal to conduct his or her own research and then decide the best way to adapt to the situation at their campus.  Situations from a textbook may apply to your campus, but at times, no campus will be the same.  It is up to the leadership of that campus to apply what they know and what they find to the situation they encounter. 
In Week One, we defined Administrative inquiry through reading the Dana text. “Inquiring professionals seek out change and reflect on their practice by posing questions or “wonderings,” collecting data to gain insights into their wonderings, analyzing the data along with reading relevant literature, making changes in practice based on new understandings developed during inquiry, and sharing findings with other.”(Dana, pg. 2-3) Week One also allowed us to develop our own blogs dealing with Action Research.  I have never been interested in blogs and rarely visited them.  Since, I have designed my own blog, I have begun to research other’s blog and become enlightened to the information that can be spread through technology. 
In Week Two, we viewed interviews from three educational leaders.  They described action research on their campus and provided examples of findings they have discovered.  Additionally, we dissected nine common action research topics to give us ideas about our research.  I decided to pick a topic that dealt with school performance.  I was curious to find the correlation between passing rates of involved students versus non-involved students.  I met with my site-supervisor and he agreed that this was a quality topic and was interested to hear about my findings.
Week three’s assignment called for us to decide on an action research topic and design our plan.  The question I will pose deals with, “What role does participation in extra-curricular activities have on student’s grades, eligibility and how do these activities impact the culture of the school?”
I again met with my site supervisor to decide on possible contacts and resources needed to address my research.  We discussed various avenues of research including, classrooms, websites, attendance logs and grade reports.  Week 3 concluded with the eight steps in analyzing action research, described in the Harris text. Basically, we broke down our topic and answered any questions we might have before we began extensive research.  We posted our findings in our blogs and also commented on other students; blogs.

In Week 4, we analyzed methods for collecting data. These methods included the Force Field Analysis, Delphi Method, Nominal Group.  Because I am very busy with various activities, the Delphi method caught my attention. This method involves getting a large amount of input for school improvement in a very short amount of time.  Questions are sent to as many as 20 stakeholders via email, which deal directly with a school issue. A facilitator gathers the responses and publishes them for all the responders to view.  A summary of answers is presented to the group and members adjust original responses to form a consensus with the group.  I will use this method in my action research by emailing sponsors and coaches to investigate hypothesis.
Other highlights of this course include the discussion boards and web conferences that Dr. Abshire administered.  Not only did we get to collaborate with other future leaders on action research but we also got the opportunity to help each other on problems we had with various technological applications. 

Dana, N.F. (2009) Leading with Passion and Knowledge: The Principal as the Action Researcher: Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press

Monday, February 13, 2012

Week 4


The CARE Model provides researchers the opportunity to evaluate their topics.  Here are my concerns, Affirmations, Recommendations and Evaluation of extra-curricular activities effect of grades/eligibility.


Extra-Curricular Activities’ Effects on Grades
Concerns
  1. Students who are involved in extra-curricular activities do not pass. - 3
  2. Resisting forces are greater than changing forces of improvement. -1
  3. Being involved has no effect of grades of students. - 2

Affirmations
  1. Athletes at Carroll have high passing rates. - 1
  2. Students with fewer behavior incidences have higher grades at Carroll. - 2
  3. Students who have a high attendance rate are more involved in groups. – 3

Recommendations
  1. Time management and structure leads to improved grades. - 1
  2. Competition and teamwork develop a positive framework for learning. - 2
  3. Leadership skills are learned and developed by involved students. – 3

Evaluations
  1. Grade Reports will be monitored and documented for non – involved students - 3
  2. Eligibility Reports will be analyzed comparing data. - 2
  3. Participation reports will be conducted to show improvement in participation. - 1

Monday, February 6, 2012

Week 3 Findings

I've been actively researching my project for ten years.  I am always trying to promote extra-curricular activities  to students at my school.  I know that if students become involved and experience teamwork in a positive manner, good things will happen.  "No Pass, No Play" was first suggested by Ross Perot in 1984.  Texas soon implemented the law that required students to pass all classes in order to participate in school sponsored extra-curricular activities.  It is a great policy and I believe that passing rates are higher because of this policy.

Week 3


Outcomes
Activities
Resources/Research Tools
Responsibility to Address Activities
Time Line
Assessments
Revisions to SIP/PIP based on monitoring
Increase involvement
Hold Club Meetings to encourage  membership(Band, Cheerleaders)
School Newspaper
Announcements
School Email
Sponsors of extracurricular activities
6 weeks
Chart the number of increased participants
Change method of presentation if necessary
Increase Grades
Conduct Pep Rallies for each activity
Surveys
Grade Reports
Coaches and Sponsors
 3 week grading period
Document the grades of participants in the school functions
Student involvement in public activities
Fewer Behavior Issues
After School Activities
Attendance at Practice or Rehearsals during the weekday
Sponsors/Teachers /Coaches of extracurricular Activities
6 weeks
ISS Reports on extracurricular participants
Revise Plan if not acquiring desired results
Increased School Pride
Public Service Opportunities
Teams and Clubs will collaborate to help the community
Coaches/Sponsors
3 weeks
Fundraising and Participation results
Mandatory or voluntary
Increased Parental Involvement
Parent Meetings to display advantages of extra-curricular activities
Email notifications, callouts, letters, Facebook, web-site banner and school newspaper articles.
Parents, Teachers, Coaches,
3 weeks
Attendance of meetings will serve as the assessment
Increased advertising if numbers are low